On February 22, I asked the above questions and gave some evidence that it would run into the 1200s (click here).
So, do we have answers to the above questions? Yes we do:
- Was Gold Overbought? ANSWER: YES
- How Far Will It Run From 2/22/2009? ANSWER: No where, that was an intermediate top.
Time for me to eat a little humble pie. But the article did begin with "I don't know how much credence what I'm about to present". I've been eating a lot of humble pie this week. On Monday I "called' (actually guessed) that the bottom was in. WRONG.
I guess one more thing. When I put the original 2/22/2009 post on a precious metals message board it got 30 "recommendations". This is a good gauge of how much people like to get information that confirms their biases even if it really doesn't have much to back it up.
MontyHigh
Just because something turns out to be wrong, doesn't mean it didn't have much to back it up. It was a good post, and presented good arguments. Patterns seem like they ought to have been completely predictable once they're fully formed - they almost always conform to what technical analysis predicts. But when only half the data is there, guessing just which pattern is forming is very challenging.
Posted by: Neil | March 04, 2009 at 02:28 AM